Most loan originator license denial questions on the SAFE MLO test turn on one of two bars. A license revoked in any governmental jurisdiction bars an applicant permanently, subject to one narrow exception, and a felony conviction bars for seven years from the date of the application, or forever if the felony involved fraud, dishonesty, breach of trust or money laundering. Both come from the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE Act) at 12 USC s. 5104(b), and Regulation H carries them, with added detail, at 12 CFR s. 1008.105.
The six minimum standards a state has to find
A state is free to demand more than the federal floor, and is barred from licensing anyone who misses one of these. The applicant:
- Has never had a loan originator license revoked in any governmental jurisdiction.
- Has no disqualifying felony conviction, guilty plea or nolo contendere plea, on the two windows below.
- Has demonstrated financial responsibility, character and general fitness such as to command the confidence of the community and to warrant a determination that the originator will operate honestly, fairly and efficiently.
- Has completed the 20 hours of pre-licensing education, covered in the pre-licensing education guide.
- Has passed the written test that meets the statute’s test requirement.
- Has met a net worth or surety bond requirement, or paid into a state fund, as the state requires.
Each of the six is examinable on its own, and uniform state content practice covers them.
The felony lookback windows
The seven-year window runs back from the date of the application for licensing and registration, and catches any felony at all. The second window has no end date: a felony that involved an act of fraud, dishonesty or a breach of trust, or money laundering, bars at any time preceding the application, however long ago.
A conviction in a domestic, a foreign or a military court counts. Whether a particular crime is a felony is decided by the law of the jurisdiction where the conviction happened, which Regulation H spells out and the statute leaves implied (12 CFR s. 1008.105(b)(2)(ii)).
Expunged and pardoned convictions
Regulation H answers this where the statute does not. Expunged convictions and pardoned convictions “do not, in themselves, affect the eligibility of the individual” (12 CFR s. 1008.105(b)(2)(i)). The words “in themselves” are the whole of the qualification: the conviction stops being an automatic bar, and the conduct behind it can still be weighed under the character and general fitness standard.
A revoked license is a permanent bar, with one exception
The statute says never, and means any governmental jurisdiction rather than any state. Regulation H adds the single carve-out: a revocation that has been formally vacated is not treated as a revocation (12 CFR s. 1008.105(a)). Vacating an order is a formal act by the body that made it, so a revocation that was appealed, settled or allowed to expire remains a revocation.
Financial responsibility, character and general fitness
This is the open-textured standard, and Regulation H is the version to read, because it adds eight words the statute leaves out: the finding is made “under reasonable standards established by the individual state” (12 CFR s. 1008.105(c)). The federal text poses the question and each state sets the standard it is answered against.
A credit report is part of the file, and the federal text is narrower here than it is often reported to be. An applicant has to authorize the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) to obtain an independent credit report from a consumer reporting agency, and to obtain information about any administrative, civil or criminal findings by any governmental jurisdiction (12 USC s. 5104(a)(2); 12 CFR s. 1008.105(h)). Neither the statute nor Regulation H names a credit score, a debt level, a lien, a judgment or a bankruptcy as a disqualifier. Those figures are the state’s own standards, and any number you see attached to them nationally has no federal provision behind it.
Who can take a license away
The same rules that put a license in place make a state build the machinery to remove one. A state’s supervisory authority has to hold the legal power to suspend, terminate and refuse renewal of a loan originator license for a violation of state or federal law, to issue cease and desist orders, to examine books and records, to summon a licensee and take testimony under oath, and to impose civil money penalties on anyone originating without a valid license (12 CFR s. 1008.111(b)).
The performance standards go further. To be treated as providing effective supervision, a supervisory authority has to approve or deny applications, renew or refuse renewal for violations of state or federal law, discipline licensees with suspensions, revocations, cease and desist orders, civil money penalties and consumer refunds, and examine or investigate licensees either on identified risk factors or on a schedule (12 CFR s. 1008.113(a)). Separately, a supervisory authority is required under state law to report violations, enforcement actions and other relevant information to NMLS (12 CFR s. 1008.111(d)), which is why a revocation in one state follows an originator into the next.
Every standard is tested again at renewal
Renewal is not a formality. The minimum standards for renewal are that the originator continues to meet the minimum standards for issuance, and has satisfied the annual continuing education requirement of at least 8 hours (12 USC s. 5105(a); 12 CFR s. 1008.107(a)). A felony conviction or a revocation elsewhere during the licensed year reaches the renewal, because the issuance standards are tested again each time.
The outline files license law and regulation, grounds for denying a license and license maintenance under Uniform State Content, which the outline weights at 11 percent of the test.
Four of the edge cases are answered in Regulation H and left out of the statute: the vacated revocation, the expunged or pardoned conviction, who classifies a crime as a felony, and the state’s own reasonable standards for financial responsibility.
Sources
- SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act, 12 USC ss. 5104 and 5105, subsections 5104(a), 5104(b) and 5105(a), US Code release point 119-102
- Regulation H, 12 CFR ss. 1008.105, 1008.107, 1008.111 and 1008.113
- MLO Testing Handbook, 6.1 Content Outline. Restricted document, cited by section and never quoted